Before you commit to the go-live date, get an independent answer
Every implementation partner will tell you the programme is ready. Tequma tells your board whether that is actually true - across data, integration, testing, cutover and business readiness.
The question boards should ask
“Are we ready?” is not a question the party delivering the build can answer objectively. A failed go-live costs multiples of an independent review - in revenue, remediation and credibility.
What the review covers
Cutover & rollback.
Is the cutover plan executable - and is there a real way back?
Data.
Migration quality, reconciliation, ownership of open defects.
Integration & clean core.
End-to-end readiness of critical business processes.
Testing.
Coverage, defect trends, exit criteria that mean something.
Business readiness.
Training, hypercare model, first-week operating plan.
Governance.
Who decides go / no-go - and on what evidence.
What you receive
Board-ready readiness verdict
A clear decision framework: go, conditional go with named actions, or no-go with a credible path to yes. No hedging.
- ✓Go - confidence that critical risks are understood and controlled.
- ✓Conditional go - with named actions, owners and deadlines.
- ✓No-go - with a credible path back to yes.